Federal Judge Orders White House to Restore AP’s Access to Presidential Events

On Tuesday, a federal judge ruled the White House must restore the AP’s access to presidential events. U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden found the Trump administration violated free speech rights by limiting media access. The ruling requires restoring access to critical areas, including the Oval Office and Air Force One. The decision emphasizes the importance of press freedom in government transparency and accountability. The Associated Press had been restricted from these key locations during the previous administration.

Unconstitutional Actions Cited

Judge McFadden found it unconstitutional for the Trump administration to treat the Associated Press differently from other media organizations. The decision stemmed from the AP’s refusal to alter its style guide to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America, as President Trump had insisted. The judge ruled that such actions violated the First Amendment.

Mandatory Restoration of Access

The ruling requires the White House to restore the AP’s access to restricted areas. These include events like Oval Office meetings and Air Force One, which are available to other members of the White House press pool. The judge also instructed Trump officials to revoke their denial of the AP’s access based on viewpoint discrimination.

Delay to Allow for Appeal

The judge delayed enforcing the order until April 13, allowing the Trump administration time to appeal. The ruling emphasized violations. It clearly stated that the press’s constitutional rights were being infringed upon. The delay grants additional time for legal actions and responses. This decision highlights serious concerns regarding freedom of the press.

---

---

No Preferential Treatment for AP

While affirming the AP’s victory, Judge McFadden clarified that the court was not granting preferential treatment. The decision simply stated that if the government opens access to certain journalists, it cannot exclude others based on their perspectives. This ruling upholds the First Amendment’s guarantee of equal treatment.

A Victory for Press Freedom

The decision marked a significant win for the Associated Press and other media outlets that had faced scrutiny from the Trump administration. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s reforms, including a new media seat and reorganized seating in the press room, reflect ongoing tensions between the press and the White House.

AP’s Statement of Reaffirmation

Following the ruling, AP spokeswoman Lauren Easton emphasized the importance of the decision. “Today’s ruling reaffirms the fundamental right of the press and the public to express themselves freely without governmental retribution,” she said. The AP pledged to continue providing impartial coverage of the White House.

Initial Dismissal and Legal Action

In February, the AP filed a lawsuit after the White House told it to comply with demands for event access. Despite efforts to resolve the issue, the AP pursued legal action to defend its editorial independence. The lawsuit challenged restrictions on press freedom and sought to uphold constitutional rights. The AP argued that media access shouldn’t depend on political conditions.

Consequences of the Ban

Judge McFadden highlighted the ban’s practical consequences, such as hindering AP coverage of Trump’s meeting with Zelensky. Consequently, the AP had to rely on foreign photos, impacting the quality and timeliness of its reporting. Furthermore, the judge called the White House’s actions “brazen,” reinforcing that restrictions stemmed from the AP’s viewpoint. Thus, the judge confirmed the infringement on press freedom.

---