Jack Smith revives Trump’s election interference charges
Special Counsel Jack Smith aims to revive the federal prosecution against Donald Trump regarding election interference charges. He presented a comprehensive 165-page document outlining allegations that the former president “resorted to crimes” in an attempt to retain power following his defeat in the 2020 election. This filing, unsealed on Wednesday in a Washington, D.C., trial court, defends the case amid a recent Supreme Court ruling granting broad immunity to presidents regarding actions taken within their constitutional authority.
Arguments from Special Counsel Smith
Smith’s team contends that Trump’s actions constituted a “fundamentally private scheme,” rendering him susceptible to prosecution. They emphasize that the former president’s conduct during and after the election exceeds the protections typically granted to executive actions. The prosecution argues that this case is vital for upholding the rule of law. It also aims to prevent future attempts to undermine democratic processes.
Trump’s Response and Claims of Political Bias
In response, Trump has entered a not guilty plea, accusing Jack Smith of disregarding the Supreme Court’s ruling. Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung labeled the court filing as “riddled with falsehoods.” He stated, “This entire case is a partisan, unconstitutional witch hunt that should be dismissed in its entirety, along with ALL the remaining Democrat hoaxes.”
Private Conversations and Statements
Prosecutors revealed that Trump made comments aboard Marine One after Election Day, telling his family, “It doesn’t matter if you won or lost the election. You still have to fight like hell.” This statement, overheard by a White House aide, is presented as evidence of Trump’s determination to cling to power, regardless of the election outcome. The aide, however, was not directly part of the conversation, which prosecutors argue highlights its private nature.
False Narratives and Internal Doubts
In December 2020, Trump amplified a false narrative alleging misconduct at State Farm Arena in Atlanta, claiming that election workers counted “suitcases” of fraudulent ballots. Prosecutors assert that this claim received public disproval, and they communicated this to Trump; yet, he continued to promote these allegations. Internal communications among Trump’s campaign staff revealed their awareness that these claims lacked evidence. One campaign adviser noted that their legal team could not substantiate the allegations.
January 6 Incident and Trump’s Reaction
Prosecutors argue that Trump’s Twitter post on January 6, which criticized then-Vice President Mike Pence for not obstructing President Biden’s victory, incited rioters at the Capitol. An aide informed Trump that Pence had been moved to a secure location, but Trump’s dismissive response—”So what?”—is highlighted in Smith’s filing as evidence of his indifference to the unfolding violence.
Vice-presidential debate moments set stage for Election Day
The Vice-presidential debate marked a critical juncture for both candidates. They outlined their strategies and policies for the upcoming election…
Attempts to Convince Trump of Election Loss
Many within Trump’s circle attempted to convince him that he had lost the election. In a recently revealed conversation, one of Trump’s lawyers warned that his claims lacked legal merit. Trump’s retort—”the details don’t matter”—illustrates his refusal to accept the reality of his defeat.
Pence’s Repeated Warnings
During this tumultuous period, then-Vice President Mike Pence disclosed that he tried to encourage Trump to acknowledge the election results. Pence approached Trump as a friend, offering gentle suggestions to accept the outcome. His advice revealed a strained relationship between the two men. Despite Pence’s encouragement, the former president remained entrenched in his beliefs. Pence also urged Trump to consider a run in 2024.
Barr’s Opposition to Trump’s Claims
Then-Attorney General Bill Barr publicly opposed Trump’s allegations of election fraud after seeing Trump’s comments on Fox News. Barr asserted that the Justice Department found no evidence of widespread fraud capable of altering the election results. This disclosure came without Trump’s knowledge, further illustrating the growing divide between the former president and his legal advisors.
Pre-Election Strategy Revealed
As the election approached, advisers informed Trump that it would be closely contested. They warned him that early leads could diminish as officials counted mail-in votes. Internally, Trump had a strategy prepared. A political adviser suggested that Trump would simply declare victory, regardless of the actual results, revealing a predetermined plan to contest the election outcome.
This new evidence presented by Jack Smith strengthens the case against Trump. It sheds light on the internal dynamics of his campaign. The ongoing legal proceedings will undoubtedly shape the future political landscape as the 2024 election approaches.
Subscribe to a 2-year WSJ and Barron’s News plan, compatible with iOS, Android, PC, and Mac. Enjoy exclusive insights, expert stock picks, live TV, and audio articles. Stay informed!